I have no idea what video you're referencing.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Has your advisee looked at USB digital microscopes? I know little about
> them, except that they exist and at least some consumer models aren't
> that expensive. I was ogling some in a shop a while ago, but don't
> remember details.
>
> I found this on Amazon for $168, not the $299 in the video.
> <http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-44340-Digital-Biological-Microscope/dp/B0014YNGCK/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=industrial&qid=1277847210&sr=8-3>
> The video is inconsistent, saying 2MP, but then saying 2048x1536 pixels,
> which is 3MP. The manual says 1200x1600 = 2MP. The other trouble is,
> they don't say what the field coverage is. Image size for 1x1 cm using
> the G7 is 1500x1500.
>
> With the LCD stated as eq. to a 10X eyepiece, the lowest magnification
> would be 40x, so 1 cm. of the subject would be 40 cm on screen, I think?
> The 4:3 LCD screen is 88mm, so it's ~53 x 70 mm, so the 1 cm.sq. subject
> would fill it 80% vertically, and the same would be true of the images.
>
> At 100x, a 5x5 mm subject would still fit vertically on the screen,
> assuming I've figured this out correctly. :-)
>
> Not pushing this thingie, but I was curious. Looks like there are a
> number of other options from Celestron and others, but a shortage of
> reviews. There are also USB cameras to simply replace the eyepiece of
> regular microscopes.
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|