I agree. Your first two links took 2-3 seconds to load and your own
link about 6 seconds. My cable connection isn't the fastest available
as it runs between 900 kbps and 1000 kbps. Based simply on bit rates
your connection seems off by a factor of 2... a very signficant number
when a factor of two means 6 minutes vs. 3 minutes.
Chuck Norcutt
Andrew Fildes wrote:
> ?
> I'm on copper - ADSL2+
> The whole page took less than 10 seconds to load.
> I don't think it's copper that's the problem.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 12/06/2010, at 6:43 PM, Brian Swale wrote:
>
>> A few days ago when Jez invited us to look at
>> http://www.nothere.be I clicked onto it and was amazed at how slow
>> it is to
>> load. Because it uses Flash.
>> I don't understand why people use Flash programming.
>>
>> I'm on dialup, and my new house has a connection speed at the time of
>> these checks of about 33.6 kbps.
>> "Broadband" as supplied here is not on fibre-optic cable, but copper
>> cable,
>> and for the extra cost one might get anything from 20 to 100 kbps.
>> Not
>> worth paying for.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|