Full frame sensor in the M9.
Chuck Norcutt
siddiq@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Huh, I thought the M9 was around 5k, not 7! I guess that was the M8(.2).
>
> /s
>
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> <snip>
>> $6,995 for body only at B&H in NYC.
>> <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=leica+m9&N=0&InitialSearch=yes>
>>
> <snip>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Simon Worby wrote:
>>> Thanks for all the comments.
>>>
>>> I sort of sense Leica is the only option, which I think is unfortunately
>>> what I was expecting. I know nothing about Leica; SLR is not a
>>> prerequisite as I'm happy with rangefinders in principle, and own
>>> several old Oly rangefinders. But the only ones I've come across with
>>> interchangeable lenses have been awkward, to say the least, presumably
>>> this limitation has been addressed?
>>>
>>> Which Leica should I look at?
>>>
>>> How much does it cost?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Simon
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|