Thanks much. Now I understand the lens listings and prices at KEH.
90/3.5 "KL L" with caps and Pro-S, SD adapter in EX condition is $235.
90/3.8 (slightly smaller aperture and no "KL L" designation and no caps)
is $76.
I also don't understand this Pro-S, SD adapter thingie although I
believe Pro-S and SD are camera body model designations.
Chuck Norcutt
Wayne Harridge wrote:
> The "native" RZ lenses have an electronic shutter controlled by the
> RZ body. You can use RB lenses on an RZ body but not RZ lenses on an
> RB body.
>
> I'm pretty sure the latest series of RB lenses (K/L) are optically
> equivalent to the latest RZ lenses.
>
> Since the RB was released quite a while before the RZ the original RB
> lenses (single coated) aren't rated as highly as RZ lenses.
>
> RZ is battery dependant, RB is not.
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>> Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What's the fundamental difference between an RB and an RZ? I take
>> it the RZ lenses are of later design with better coatings? Do RB
>> lenses fit on RZ bodies and vice-versa?
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|