We are very lucky here, we never have any lip sync problem with the HDTV air
broadcast, the pictures are always very clean. May be it is due to a small
place, the power is good enough to cover most areas.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sue Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
>
>> I have both, and have had for years. The difference between the old
>> analog signals and DTV is an obvious improvement on the 27" analog CRT.
>> The improvement going from analog to HD on the digital set is night and
>> day.
> Regardless of what you see with the best possible signal, there are some
> problems-
> Over the air reception is problematic. One local station had to add a
> second
> channel and transmitter and antenna to get out enough power to barely, and
> I
> do mean barely cover its former area. Others have had to increase power,
> and
> the FCC h ad special programs to speed power requests after the
> conversion.
> Our local public TV station, already in a weaker position, simply doesn't
> have the money to increase power and has lost almost all its coverage in
> highly populated areas. Perhaps Sesame Street for cows is in order. Like
> all
> things digital, there is no "fringe" area, that's one of low signal, not
> one
> like in your community, the signal is either great or not at all.
>
> With cable and over the air, we have ongoing problems with sound and
> picture
> being offset slightly sometimes. Sometimes pictures can freeze, and can
> pixelllate strangely.
>
> Analog channels on the cable look worse than on an analog TV.
>
> Live things like sports, often look great, while programs that I watch,
> that
> are filmed or taped, can be a problem.
>
> When it's good, DTV is great. When not, it's awful.
>
> Bill Pearce
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|