John, I suspect if you haven't seen it before, then it's probably
an anomaly with my lens (I suspect you've seen more than the rest
of us combined). As I said, its very slight, I doubt that it could
have any meaningful impact on exposure.
thanks,
Dawid
On 06 May 2010, at 2:32 PM, John Hermanson wrote:
> I don't know, it may be a quirk of that lens.
> ___________________________________
> John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
> 21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
> 631-424-2121 | www.zuiko.com
> Olympus OM Service since 1977
> Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
>
>
> Dawid Loubser wrote:
>> So what you could be saying, is that the 250/2.0 is really a
>> 250/1.8 for
>> focusing :-) Wow :-) Or it's really a 250/2.2...
>>
>> But before we start making assumptions, I'd really like somebody in
>> the know to confirm, or somebody with another 250/2.0 to check
>> their lens' behavour.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|