I recognized what you meant, and saw the comment on one of your images.
Is there much difference in your 1200 x 1600=1.9MP image and my downsized
2.0MP image from the E-1? Mine started out as a RAW image, but, once
converted to jpeg, I thought they would be roughly equal.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Flower Image - The E-1 Still Provides Fine Images
> On 4/9/2010 4:05 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Beautiful lighting and details, Moose.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> Yes, I normally downsize to less than 3MP for posting.
>>
>
> No, I'm talking an original image size out of the camera of 1200x1600 =
> 1.9MP.
>
> E-1 is 1920x2560 = 4.9MP
>
> Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|