Can't say I truly understand the "3D" effect with many Zeiss
lenses--something to do with the high resolution, biting microcontrast
and
perhaps the bokeh. In some shots the latter may be a minus. It didn't
review as well as I expected on photozone but Andrew has much company
in his opinion.
http://www.photozone.de/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/380-zeiss_za_2470_28
(not even a FF review)
Mike
That was most interesting/useful. I like the 850/900 and LOVE the
Zeiss 24-70mm. (Best standard zoom I've ever used).
Shot the 850 recently but got the dynamic range setting wrong in hard
sunlight - it has five steps.
Not quite sure why - in what circumstances do you want reduced dynamic
range and does increasing it compromise the image in some way?
Couldn't find an answer to that one.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 08/01/2010, at 11:29 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:08 PM, <usher99@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Not sure I see any signs Sony would throw in the towel. They seem to
>> be taken seriously by wedding photogs already. The nice Zeiss glass
>> doesn't hurt either.
>>
>> http://photo.net/wedding-photography-forum/00V98v
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|