A 4 stops higher ISO would have produced a correct exposure. But he was
deliberately underexposing to test shadow recovery. DPP clearly works
better than ACR in this case (at least for the 5DMkII). But my point
(and I think Moose's as well) is that I don't (normally) care because I
wouldn't think of even trying to recover shadow detail that was 4 stops
underexposed.
Chuck Norcutt
SwissPace wrote:
> Yesterday I was going to suggest that maybe trying a higher ISO (as they
> are so detailed and clean) instead of using low iso settings, unless you
> particularly need low ISO because it is so bright but as we are dealing
> with shadows I am guessing this is not an issue, but then I read it
> affects all iso settings, although experimentation might find a sweet spot.
>
> On 03/12/2009 13:56, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> As I have mentioned different people has different acceptance standard and
>> it related to how they use their camera. BTW, I don't see any problem in
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|