> I know this is heresy to say, but the Canon G10 is as close to the Olympus
> XA as we've seen.
>
It is indeed. I own both, and the G10 is not as "pocketable" as the XA by a
large amount. I can't say that I think the G10 is a substitute for any of my
digital cameras, and isn't the same as my Hasselblads, as Reichmann said,
but I've done some really big prints with one.
I have a friend that is a quite good photographer, and studied with some of
the California zone system guys. He recently toured Italy with JUST a G10,
as did very well. HIs stuff I've seen with it at 16x20 or so look great.
Still, it's no D3 or M9.
Bill Pearce
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|