Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Who in the world writes this junk? - Raw software rant.

Subject: Re: [OM] Who in the world writes this junk? - Raw software rant.
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:58:03 -0600
Yes, I have heard that, but I shoot Oly.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Who in the world writes this junk? - Raw software rant.


> Canon 5D raw files contain an embedded 4 MP JPEG image used for preview
> independent of any other choice to produce raw + JPEG together.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Jim,
>>
>> I run Elements 6.0 on a 4-yr old Dell desktop with 2.5GB of ram, and it
>> works fine.  I never do batch processing, but shoot RAW+jpeg, using the 
>> jpeg
>> images to proof the results and select the ones for editing.  Then I open
>> the RAW images one by one, make adjustments, and send them to the editor 
>> for
>> final work. With an established workflow pattern, all goes pretty 
>> smoothly.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Jim Couch" <zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: [OM] Who in the world writes this junk? - Raw software rant.
>>
>>
>>> I have not tried to do any batch processing yet with Elements. I am not
>>> all that interested in Lightroom's library facilities either. As far as
>>> Elements go, I just really don't care to run the whole thing just to
>>> process RAW images, not that I have found anything particularly better
>>> at this point.
>>>
>>> The laptop is running with 2gb of RAM, enough to run things, but
>>> obviously more would be better. The machine at work runs with 4, but is
>>> a bit older.
>>>
>>> Jim Couch
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>> When using ACR in PhotoShop one can save the converted files (many all
>>>> at once) if various file formats and with custom naming conventions all
>>>> without passing through the editor if desired.  I don't know what
>>>> Elements does but I'd be surprised if Lightroom was much different than
>>>> PS.  I haven't gone to Lightroom since ACR with PhotoShop can do all 
>>>> the
>>>> batch conversions I'm interested in and I have no interest in
>>>> Lightroom's library facilities.
>>>>
>>>> How much memory on your laptop?
>>>>
>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz