Never mind what I said earlier. With the smaller versions, the
brighter looks better. When I looked at the larger versions, I found
the darker much more likable. For me, it would all come out in the
print. Which makes the better print?
--Bob Whitmire
www.bwp33.com
On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> I'd go a little more than half, but my eyes are old and tired. The
> darker shot is, well, darker, and on the web at least, seems to have
> less definition of elements. The brighter image has more than enough
> definition, but probably isn't true to the original vision.
>
> Have you tried converting to black & white? Sometimes that makes the
> darker image seem more "real." I'm not sure how well dark and color go
> together, unless there is a bright spot of color to give context to
> the dark.
>
> Sorry, just rambling . . .
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> www.bwp33.com
>
> On Nov 6, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> I'd go half way in between.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Philippe Amard wrote:
>>> Two versions of the same; can't make my mind about which, both
>>> probably
>>> best viewed large.
>>> Slow connection users beware !
>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/FF-Halloween+-1130962.jpg.html
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
