Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film

Subject: Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:48:04 -0400
And $12 for a roll of processed film compared to $3,000 for a DSLR was 
not a bogus argument?  :-)

Chuck Norcutt

Ken Norton wrote:
>> You forgot to multiply your $12 by the equivalent of the  4,166 rolls of
>> film that my 5D can take before its shutter gives out.
>>
>>
> I believe that to be a bogus argument. You have to calculate based on the
> time-span that you usually keep a camera as well as the quantity of final
> shots used.  When you figure it that way, it is really hard for most people
> to justify the investment in expensive DSLRs.
> 
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz