Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film

Subject: Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:03 -0400
You forgot to multiply your $12 by the equivalent of the  4,166 rolls of 
film that my 5D can take before its shutter gives out.

Chuck Norcutt

Ken Norton wrote:

> 
> I'm not going to declare that "film rules, digital drools", but comparisons
> like this show that if the photographer really does give a rip about doing
> things well, an investment of $12 USD is nearly equal to an investment of
> $3000.
> 
> However, most of us choose to spend the money for the digital solution.
> 
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz