On 23 Sep 2009, at 3:22 PM, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
> You are right, I haven't tried it and I've been intrigued with the
> thought
> of a 35mm equiv. 300mm f2.
I hate to be an equivalency bitch, but (optical superiority aside) the
ZD 150mm f/2
really does produce the same "look" (depth of field) as a 300mm f/4 on
35mm.
Now, give me an Zuiko 250mm f/2 for my OM-1, and then we're talking...
Pity it weighs
4 big ones (thousand dollars, and kilograms) if lucky enough to find
one :-)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|