Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images

[Chuck Norcutt]

If that was your interpretation then you misunderstood.  But what is 
clear is that sharpening is best performed at the resolution and 
dimensions of the final print.  If you do that in camera and go 
immediately to print then the JPEG image must be optimized for the 
specific size print.  You can't get optimal results for a 4x6 and a 9x12 
off the same JPEG image.  If you're going to shoot JPEG it should be 
unsharpened and then resized and sharpened for the specific output size. 
  The only relation to raw here is that raw is unsharpened by definition.

Chuck Norcutt


Ken Norton wrote:
>> And now you know that his bluff has been called.  He is unable to answer
>> the question.  :-)
>>
> 
> 
> That's not it at all.  I'm just not into picking fights today.  I could
> quote you from a couple posts ago about how we (you, not me) need to shoot
> RAW to get images of sufficient quality for a 9x12 print.
> 
> I was VERY specific on how to maximize JPEG image quality and be able to
> survive without resorting to the RAW.
> 
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/