Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:24:22 -0400
And now you know that his bluff has been called.  He is unable to answer 
the question.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt

Ken Norton wrote:
>> I'm not objecting your statement here but I would like to know in which way
>> you see the big C's JPEG deficiency.
>>
> 
> 
> Do I need to?  Isn't it, like totally common knowledge that the Canons have
> to be shot in RAW mode in order to get anything better than 5x7" snapshot
> quality?
> 
> :)
> 
> AG (believe nothing you read on the web) Schnozz
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz