Re: [OM] B&W prints, 90/2, et al

[Stephen Troy]

At 09:53 AM 7/22/2009, you wrote:
>The 180/2 is supposed to be quite nice though it's likely not on par 
>with the canon 200/1.8 or 200/2 I'd think.


Why would you say that?  It's a spectacular piece of glass - almost 
as good as the optically perfect 250/2.  It looks like the 250's baby 
brother, especially when they're side-by-side.

Steve Troy
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/