| Subject: | Re: [OM] (IMG) Deep Purple |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 06 Jun 2009 13:51:02 -0400 |
I'm still surprised to see that much obvious diffraction around the blades. I've never seen that before. Chuck Norcutt Carlos J. Santisteban wrote: > > Chuck Norcutt wrote: >> Very nice and also very interesting. I'm wondering why the moon is >> rendered with 6 diffraction spikes. It look more like it was taken with >> an Newtonian telescope with a 3 arm spider than the 21/3.5. > > Because the 21/3.5 has a six blades diaphragm... and wasn't fully open -- I > believe f/5.6 is the optimal aperture on the tiny 21. > > Cheers, -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT making web-pages meaningful for search engine robots, Chris Barker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: confined to my neighbourhood, Nathan Wajsman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (IMG) Deep Purple, Carlos J. Santisteban |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (IMG) Deep Purple, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |