Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM ) Missed a nice lens :-((

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Missed a nice lens :-((
From: "Sue Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:56:17 -0500
I lost an ebay sale of my almost brand new 35-70 3.6 to a list member, when 
he recieved it he insisted in inspecting the inside by shining a Tensor lamp 
into it, and there was an odd reflection of the bulb, which he interpreted 
as a fault.

Of course, the later post to the list about his new purchase of an E system 
and lenses may inform.

Bill Pearce
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Missed a nice lens :-((


> You said it.  There are those who'll look for lens defects with a loupe
> and not even mount the lens on a body to take a picture.  Cleaning marks
> on a 35-80 may simply come off once cleaned properly with denature
> alcohol or other suitable solvent.
> ___________________________________
> John Hermanson  |   CPS, Inc.
> 21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
> 631-424-2121  |  www.zuiko.com
> Olympus OM Service since 1977
> Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
>
>
> Brian Swale wrote:
>> John Hermanson wrote,  quoting C H Ling
>>
>>> 35-80 replacement front element is over $300, rear element over $200, 
>>> both
>>> back ordered. ___________________________________ John Hermanson  | 
>>> CPS,
>>> Inc. 21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743 631-424-2121  |  www.zuiko.com
>>> Olympus OM Service since 1977 Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>> C.H.Ling wrote:
>>>> You probably haven't read the details, there is cleaning marks/coating
>>> marks
>>>> on front and rear elements.
>>>>
>>>> C.H.Ling
>>
>> The importance of such marks can be over-estimated, as far as I know. I
>> believe the seller's notes on this were probably fair comment.
>>
>> How many of you remember the 24mm Zuiko shift lens grafted onto a 6x6
>> camera body, that hit eVilBay?  That lens had a large chip on one one 
>> side,
>> fixed with a dab of silicone sealant as far I could tell. Made NO 
>> apparent
>> difference, to judge by the large test image posted..
>> I have read other reports that chips etc especially on the front element 
>> make
>> little or no difference (unless hit by direct sunlight ! )
>>
>> Brian Swale.
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.53/2156 - Release Date: 06/05/09 
06:24:00

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz