Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] ( OM ) Missed a nice lens :-((

Subject: [OM] ( OM ) Missed a nice lens :-((
From: usher99@xxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:59:02 -0400
Yep,
I remember just before joining the list checking on opinions on the Tam 
28-105 as it was sold NIB at B&H --not sure that is still the case.
I found the John Lind "door stop" comment (later retracted) and later 
acquired the 35-105  from a list member.  The poor MTF wide open can  
make the newer version too difficult to focus.  As long as we're 
quoting the archive:

http://lists.tako.de/Olympus-OM/2004-09/msg01692.html

The corners at the wide end of the 35-105 don't sharpen up until well 
stopped down, but that is OK as I'll put it on a tripod or use a prime.
It's barrell dist can be a bother, however.  I know Moose wouldn't like 
it for an all purpose walk-around with its limited macro ability.

Per a recent post several virtually NIB Z. 35-80 were available for a 
very nice price.  Paul (doesn't post much here now) likes his on FF
dig and surprisingly didn't like the color rendition of the (?King nl 
range zoom) of the CZ 35-70 f3.4. the latter has a photodo # of 3.8
and the "microcontrast" of the CZ glass seems real enough to me though 
I've only examined a half dozen images. The latter has less geometric 
distortion ( -2.5 to 1.93% vs -3.4 to 2.56%)

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/752043

After being able to try the A-S system through the amazing generosity 
of a list member, I was hooked.  I don't think I spent a fortune.
The MPR (multipupose rail) serves as a great focusing rail on the 
autotube and I use it as a large QR plate on some lenses.  One can put 
a miniclamp on it to mount a cam as well.  Many of my keepers (few and 
far between though they be) were using the MPR.  There are other good 
solutions to be sure, but the engineering is superb.
Mike




I believe John Lind who used a pair of Tamron SP 35-105 f2.8 lenses was 
less
than thrilled with the newer 28-105.

I think the real key is in the second part. To see the difference 
requires
pretty careful technique. My own experience with the 35-105 Tamron and 
35-80
Zuiko is that they are very close ... and tying in to your (much?) 
earlier
post I do see a need for Arca Swiss style quick release, my half dozen 
or so
Manfrotto plates went to live with another list member who has a 
monopod ...

Mike posted a DXO link that showed how critical focus could be. It takes
very, very, little to turn an ultra sharp picture into merely a sharp
picture.

Me ... well I'm keeping both Zuiko 35-80 and Tamron 35-105 lenses. No
interest in the 28-105 but I like shift lenses enough that I almost 
always
use them for the wide end anyway.

Jeff Keller
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz