I also just learnt the shadow/highlight tool few weeks ago, my ex-boss (who
I brought him back into photography) told me this simple tool seems better
than the mask/curve I introduced to him :-(
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt"
> OK, I just tried the easy way and (as Walt would have sais) it's way
> more better... and better for ya too!
>
> Thanks for the lesson
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Guess I'll have to try the simple way too. I'd have never guess it was
>> that easy. In the meantime I already redid it the hard way using a mask
>> and curves. I guess it wasn't necessary but at least I forced myself to
>> learn how to convert selections to masks and to load masks from alpha
>> channels into layer masks. That was worth it. :-)
>> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/Mt%20Rainier/index.htm>
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Moose wrote:
>>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>> Thanks. I prefer it too but don't know how you did that.
>>>>
>>> Image=>Adjust=>Shadow/Highlight=> Shadow Amount = 0, Highlight settings
>>> about 35, 30, 20 or to taste. No masks, no tricks, nothing but the one
>>> adjustment.
>>>
>>> Moose
>>>
>>>> Moose wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The clouds look awfully washed out to me. I prefer it with the
>>>>> highlights spread out and down a bit.
>>>>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/ChinookP1.htm>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|