Thanks Joel, Jim, Bob, Chuck, Andrew, Michael's and all for watching and the
comments.
5D II is good but no matter how good it is just a electronics device, I
enjoy OM much more, the camera and lenses just like precision equipment.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Wilcox"
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:35 PM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Here again is the yearly portrait event in the flower show in HK,
>> all shot at F2.8 with OM180/2.8 and 100/2 on a 5D II body.
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/5D2_03/TVB_09.htm
>>
>> It is hard to beat the 180/2.8 for such event, it is very sharp even wide
>> open and it did very well in isolate the background too. But the DOF
>> is really really shallow.
>>
>> Actual pixel cropped from IMG_1973 (on a 21MP body).
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_1973c.JPG
>
> Those are very hard to choose among. I think there is something
> special about the model in 1949. 1866 is a great portrait, and 1891
> has a nice blending with the background. 100% enjoyable, nothing not
> to like!
>
> You also apparently have a really good camera. ;^)
>
> Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
