Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-30

Subject: Re: [OM] E-30
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:33:31 -0600
Sorry, Chris, didn't mean to come across as suggesting you were in the
wrong or anything of the sort.  I was just expressing my own peculiar
predilections, apropos of nothing, really.

Your reference in a different post to the softness of the light in
England and Europe is interesting to me as I have never seen light as
I experienced it in England and also in Paris in the spring of 1973.
I was thinking it was something I had allowed my mind to develop into
a fiction or fantasy, but now I think not.

Peace,
Joel W.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I did too, Joel -- enjoy the demonstration.  Moose's manipulations
> (more alliteration, anyone ? :-)) makes me think more about images, as
> do Chuck's and Ken's musings or opinions. Added to that, Moose goes to
> the trouble of making suggestions with images in a practical manner.
>
> But Moose let us know his own thoughts thus prompting me to voice my
> own opinion.  As I mentioned in an earlier post, it probably has a lot
> to do with the light that we see every day.
>
> Chris
>
> On 18 Feb 2009, at 17:12, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> But, although I admire your technical expertise in your
>>> Moosification(s), I can't help feeling that "What Moose would do" is
>>> again too harsh.  I recognise, of course, that you are free to enjoy
>>> your own expression or interpretation, but as a rule I prefer the
>>> tonal softness of the original.  I enjoy the adjusted tonality of
>>> highlight or shadow, but the last one is just too "edgy" (I can't
>>> think of another word to describe how I feel about it).
>>
>> Well, I really enjoyed Moose's demonstration.  I guess it's because I
>> would have done exactly the same thing with the image if it were mine.
>> What I don't like about a lot of tinkering in PS is the tendency to
>> make it so that no one thing is more prominent than another.  Another
>> way to say this is that no High Key or Low Key images may exist in a
>> photoshopped world.  But in the case of this image, the tree cannot
>> help but be the pre-eminent element, so it feels to me that what Moose
>> has done is entirely the Right Thing To Do.  Beautiful rendition, at
>> least to my taste.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz