Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1

Subject: Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:44:49 -0600
>
> Possibly overcautious as they shoot handheld, not from tripod. But
> one of their three shooters may have been a rough handler. Who knows.
> The E-1's lasted them about 4 years without problems AFAIK - and yes,
> that's hundreds of thousands of shutter actuations - about 1000 per
> body on each visit to us. I assume that they had them serviced but
> it's a good record.
>


The more I think about it, the more impressed I am.  However, this leads to
a very fundamental problem.  One that I'm not quite sure how to address.

How in the world can I convince my wife, the CDFO, SWMBO, that my E-1 is
worn out so I can get a new camera?

I knew it was a mistake to buy the E-1.  It's the cockroach of digital
cameras.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz