Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1

Subject: Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:13:43 -0600
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian W <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Going back to my original posting I think part of my problem is the raw
> convertor in aperture, For a couple of days I shot raw and jpg (normally
> I only shoot raw) and imported both into aperture, there is a noticeable
> difference in colour and sharpness (detail)  between the two which no
> amount of raw fine tuning seems to fix. For the first time ever I opened
> the same raw image in master and compared it to the ones in aperture. It
> looks identical to the jpg version.
>
> This is a real blow as I like aperture because of its one program
> solution and ability, if anyone else is using aperture could they
> compare a raw and jpg file (you have to import the jg to a separate
> folder and then I created a smart album to see them side by side)
>
> I also opened it in camera raw 5 that came with photoshop cs4 and it
> also looks different (darker) though better than the aperture as it
> retains the detail) also does anyone use lightroom and if so could they
> do a comparison for me as well - (preferably on a mac)

No Mac here, but you are sort of dealing in issues I was just trading
notes with Chris Barker about within this thread subject heading.
What are your sharpness settings for jpg?  Is Master using jpg picture
settings (including sharpness) for this initial presentation of what
you see in RAW?

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz