Hi C.H.Ling,
So... E-3 doesn´t give you a tack sharp focus images. I readed something
in this website and it might be the reason of your problems. Anyway I
think this system is much better than E-1. You can switch to three point
AF in your E-3.
http://olyflyer.blogspot.com/
I am not quite sure but I also hear something related with E-3 AWB but
they solved with firmware update, didn´t they?
Regards,
Dave
C.H.Ling escribió:
> I had the E-1 for almost four years and the E-3 for two months, the only
> cases when E-3 is not as sharp as E-1 were due to focusing error, E-3
> resolve MUCH better than E-1 in all cases otherwise. The noise control of
> E-3 is also much better than E-1.
>
> Talking about color, if you are not using Olympus RAW it is very difficult
> to make a compare, third party software may not be that reliable. PhaseOne
> C1 just failed the color accuracy for my 5D II files.
>
> Can't remember if E-3 has the "auto gradation" function, I hate it with the
> E-520, it pull up the shadows and make lot of noise. For a fair comparison
> make sure both E-3 and E-1 has the same setting. Some people also mentioned
> the WB of E-3 is not as good as E-1 but it is easy to correct in RAW.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Ian W <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Last night I was looking through my pictures with my wife (using
>>> irfanview) and we came to the conclusion that they were better colour,
>>> sharpness and in some other unexplained way than ones taken with the
>>> E-3, not much but enough to notice has anyone else found this.
>>>
>>> maybe its to do with aperture and its raw development or maybe it's some
>>> in camera setting I have wrongly set.
>>>
>>> has anyone else found this?
>>>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|