Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR

Subject: Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:10:55 -0800
C.H.Ling wrote:
> I think you mean the test sample, the sample were made under controlled 
> lighting condition, most of the camera will look similar although there are 
> still some differences. 

I tried to make it clear that I was talking only about clarity of 
detail. I think the standardized test subjects on DPR and other test 
sites that do something similar are the best way to compare some aspects 
of IQ, but not others.

> What I see is the different in color/tone rendering under warm room light and 
> mixed light. But I have to say that Pana and Olympus are somewhat close, I 
> have the FZ18, the images from it look very nice.
>   

I freely admit that I am less sensitive to subtle color differences than 
your are. That's why I specially commented that I didn't think the test 
images were good enough for comparative color evaluation.

I was mostly writing about what have been commonly expressed weaknesses 
of 4/3 format cameras, slightly fuzzy images at the pixel level and 
poorer high ISO noise than many competitors. The G1 is the first 
indication that 4/3 designers have overcome these weaknesses.

Moose
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz