I stop using the long Zuiko on the 4/3 after getting the DZ50-200 and 1.4x.
Both 180/2.8 and 300/4.5 has CA issues, with 2x it magnified the problem. I
did use 50/3.5, 90/2 and 135/4.5 on the 4/3 for macro.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
>I rarely use the OM adapter with anything other than the 50/3.5, 90/2,
> 180/2.8, or 300/4.5. There are others I could use it with, but mostly
> the DZs cover the ranges as well or better without the inconvenience.
> (I know that Ken will be out to scalp me of what little hair I have
> left for saying that ...)
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:55 AM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Same here, the first lens I mounted on a digital body was the 50/3.5 (on
>> the
>> 10D). The focus was easy and result was excellent, I like its tone/color
>> and
>> bokeh.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>> >
>>>> When I tested my Zuikos with the E-1 several years ago, I thought the
>>>> 50/3.5 was the most natural and easy to use and among the most
>>>> pleasing in terms of the final result.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|