Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Pol question

Subject: [OM] Re: Pol question
From: "Sue Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:26:33 -0500
Mike,

As  I understand it, polarizers must be made of plastic. For whatever 
reason, glass can't be polarized. Thus, al polarizers are a sandwich, to 
protect the plastic. The ultra expensive german ones as especially sealed.

Bill Pearce
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <usher99@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 9:52 PM
Subject: [OM] Pol question


>
> Finally able to find a rear 43mm pol for the Tamron 400/4. (10 buck
> snipe)  It is a single piece of glass????  Every other pol, linear or
> otherwise, always had two.  Must be a good reason to add the extra
> glass.  I do have some pol film to put on the T28 or T32 for cross pol
> purposes but perhaps that is a suboptimal way to construct them.  I
> could see that perhaps a quarter wave retarder might be in the second
> glass for a circular flavor but it struck me as very odd construction.
> It is a bit of a pain to use with no way to rotate it externally unlike
> the newer Tam 300/2.8 AF. Any ideas of the advantages of the usual two
> glass construction?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/1733 - Release Date: 10/19/2008 
6:02 PM


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz