Is that too far away for fill flash to make a difference (especially if
lens is set to f16)? From a color balance standpoint , it could use
some red and/or yellow.
___________________________________
John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon.net
Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
Steve & Alicia Goss wrote:
>
>
> Hi, Y'all-
> Here are two pictures from my vacation. Both are from the same OM4Ti camera,
> and both on Kodachrome 64, from the same roll. Both were scanned by Dwayne's
> photo when they were processed.
> I don't remember which lens I was using for 01-025, but 01-039 was done with
> a 24mm f2.8 at f16 and a circular polarizer, to slow down the shutter as
> muchas possible.
> 01-025 was hand held, 01-039 was done on a tripod, with the self timer.
> No flash on 01-025, but I was hand holding a pair of flashes on 01-039. They
> were pointed toward the building to try to lighten it up a bit. The building
> looked quite dark compared to the rest of the scene.
>
> The main question is what went wrong on 01-039? 01-025 has a sharp scan, but
> 01-039 just looks bad. 01-039 does look fairly sharp when it is projected.
>
> Independence CO, a ghost town preserved by people from Aspen, CO.
> <http://www.speakeasy.net/~stevegoss/01-025.jpg[1]>
>
> The "Crystal Mill", actually a power plant for the mill, which was just to
> the right.
> <http://www.speakeasy.net/~stevegoss/01-039.jpg>[2]
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Links ---
> 1 http://www.speakeasy.net/%7Estevegoss/01-025.jpg
> 2 http://www.speakeasy.net/%7Estevegoss/01-039.jpg
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
