Steve
Is it just over-exposed? And with the blown highlights of the sky did
an automatic scanner introduce a colour shift, particularly in the
rock face?
The place looks magical, leaving aside the colour shift.
I've adjusted link [1], by the way. You had the "[1]" inside the
angle bracket which spoiled the link.
Chris
On 28 Aug 2008, at 04:27, Steve & Alicia Goss wrote:
> Here are two pictures from my vacation. Both are from the same OM4Ti
> camera,
> and both on Kodachrome 64, from the same roll. Both were scanned by
> Dwayne's
> photo when they were processed.
> I don't remember which lens I was using for 01-025, but 01-039 was
> done with
> a 24mm f2.8 at f16 and a circular polarizer, to slow down the
> shutter as
> muchas possible.
> 01-025 was hand held, 01-039 was done on a tripod, with the self
> timer.
> No flash on 01-025, but I was hand holding a pair of flashes on
> 01-039. They
> were pointed toward the building to try to lighten it up a bit. The
> building
> looked quite dark compared to the rest of the scene.
>
> The main question is what went wrong on 01-039? 01-025 has a sharp
> scan, but
> 01-039 just looks bad. 01-039 does look fairly sharp when it is
> projected.
>
> Independence CO, a ghost town preserved by people from Aspen, CO.
> <http://www.speakeasy.net/~stevegoss/01-025.jpg> [1]
>
> The "Crystal Mill", actually a power plant for the mill, which was
> just to
> the right.
> <http://www.speakeasy.net/~stevegoss/01-039.jpg>[2]
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
