Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Tele Football shots, was: Re: Chuck's 'round-the-country tour

Subject: [OM] Re: Tele Football shots, was: Re: Chuck's 'round-the-country tour
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:46:43 +1000
My brane hurts. I can see sense on both sides of the argument.
What we need is an old and wise Pen F user to clarify the issue.
How did a 200mm behave on that reduced format?

Damn - I expected to get beaten up over my thoughts on football, not  
this!
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 30/07/2008, at 7:35 AM, Ken Norton wrote:

> Personally, I use that rule to apply to EQUIVELENT 35mm format.  For
> example, if you can handhold a 50mm lens on a 35mm camera to 1/60th  
> of a
> second, I extend that to mean that I need 1/90 to handhold an 80mm  
> lens on a
> 645 camera.  For my 4/3 camera, also work in the same equivelents:   
> I get
> satisfactory performance handholding my 200/4 lens on the E-1 at  
> 1/400 of a
> second.



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz