| Subject: | [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:28:58 -0500 |
No clue. On 7/26/08, IanG <ian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: A sad day . . ., NSURIT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: A sad day . . ., Jim Nichols |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?, IanG |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |