As you all may remember, I'm comparing OM and E-3 photo's -- basically,
I've taken several hundred where I took the same picture (equivalent
lenses etc.) with an OM-4 and OM-2, and the E-3. My purpose is to
better understand both, but also draw some conclusions. I haven't
completed the comparisons (something about working to earn wherewithal for
the E-3 and the film/processing), but I do have an opinion on this point
in this thread.
It's that digital behaves - in my opinion - much more like transparency
film than print film. It's primarily an issue of dynamic range and
(related) forgiveness of exposure. For example, I found much more
difference in just the .3 stop bracketing in digital. Much more.
Bob Benson
PS: I'll have a fuller report soon.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|