Yes, exactly. Before taking multiple exposure shots you tell the camera
how many are going to be in the sequence (from 2-10). The camera then
divides the correct exposure time for a single shot amongst the multiple
exposures such that the final image is correct.
In the link I gave the photographer is moving the camera slightly
between exposures. In some cases it just gives what I consider to be an
unpleasant jittery look to the image. But in others (some trees for
example) it causes a misty overlay effect that looks like a soft
painting. I rather liked most of them.
Chuck Norcutt
Dan Mitchell wrote:
> Jim Couch at home wrote:
>> Multiple Exposure will
>> combing (in camera) between 2 and 10 images in a SINGLE image.
>
> So is this the same thing as underexposing by a factor of X, taking X
> shots, then adding the resulting images back together afterwards?
> (in-camera, rather than in post-processing)
>
> I'm assuming the interesting effects there are because he's moving the
> camera slightly, so bits of image are repositioned relative to other
> ones and thus get more/less(uh.. something) final intensity, right?
>
> -- dan
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|