| Subject: | [OM] Re: My E-3 returns |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:17:02 -0400 |
I've heard that too. Not sure what the difference is except that a typical camcorder has significantly lower resolution and compression of a moving image can be done by only handling the differentials between frames. Chuck Norcutt Bill Pearce wrote: > I understood that is the case on certain camcorders. > > Bill Pearce > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Johann Thorsson" <johann@xxxxxxxx> > To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:37 PM > Subject: [OM] Re: My E-3 returns > > >> My understanding was that data was simply shifted between pixels, but not >> that the sensor was being moved. >> >> J >> ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: My E-3 returns, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: 64-bit PhotoShop news, Jan Steinman |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: My E-3 returns, Bill Pearce |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: My E-3 returns, Winsor Crosby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |