Chris, the other piece is that given the amount time which has lapsed
between the shipment and the complaint, I'd probably tell the buyer to go howl
at
the moon. Bill Barber
In a message dated 2/21/2008 11:33:10 P.M. Central Standard Time,
ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Thanks for that thought, Bill. I'll mention it to my son.
Chris
On 21 Feb 2008, at 23:24, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> I would that say whoever made the decision to only insure it for
> $150 should
> suck up the difference between the true value and the insured
> value. I am
> assuming the item was well packed by your son. I suspect the buyer
> had
> encouraged a stated value less than true value to avoid VAT. If
> that is the case,
> even though your son was a coconspirator, I'd say it was the buyers
> choice
> and therefore his responsibility. My 2 cents worth Bill Barber
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|