When it comes to restaurants, you better keep your best places secret... the
best way to kill a restaurant quality is to have someone writing about it...
-----Message d'origine-----
De : olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] De la part
de Andrew Fildes
Envoyé : jeudi 20 décembre 2007 10:06
À : olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Objet : [OM] Re: Reviewing, was Now seems to be car quality, was Broken DSLR
That looks like the classic retread the press release stuff.
He'll have no trouble staying at the top of the list for a loan of
the next model.
I remember with joy a restaurant reviewer who wrote for a satirical
weekly. He always paid for his meal like a regular customer, no-one
knew what he looked like and his reviews were almost uniformly
condemnatory. Accuracy saved him from action but he only wrote about
10% positive and the negatives were delicious.
Unfortunately he wrote a rare positive on my favorite Malaysian
restaurant and within a couple of months, the place was packed and
the prices significantly higher.
I don't think you can get away with it now - one reviewer here was
sued successfully for claiming that his grilled lobster was both
burnt and cold.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20/12/2007, at 5:35 PM, Larry wrote:
> Sounds like a crappy car, and in the usual vein of various biases,
> another review says this:
>
> http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2005/03/28/022205.html
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|