I couldn't make it past the first 38 pages since I was falling asleep.
I gave up at the point where he wanted to photograph his niece in his
back yard but didn't want the word "Prowler" on his neighbor's RV to be
readable. So he launched into a dissertation on how to approach this
problem from a mathematical standpoint. My sleepy brain instead
screamed the well remembered words of my photo mentor "Don't take the
photo there!!!" I responded (to myself); "But I must. I can't take it
elsewhere." The ghostly mentor replied; "Then take out the RV with
PhotoShop. Keep your attention on the subject. And be quick about it.
Her attention is drifting. Probably doesn't want a math lesson."
Beep! Ah. Focused right on her beautiful eyes! Snap! OK, we're done.
"Harold! Harold Merklinger! Come on! We're done here." Harold
replies: "Sorry, not done yet. I seem to have misplaced my calculator."
Dr. Focus (who is usually, but not always, in pretty good focus)
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Interesting argument that if one desires infinity to be in? sharp
> focus focus at infinity with little loss. Hyperfocal distance has its
> drawbacks.?? Probably depends on what the emphasis of the image is.?
> Only read? the paper in a cursory fashion and we'll see what Dr.
> Focus et al have to say.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
> http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/TIAOOFe.pdf
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003
>
>
>
> ============================================== List usage info:
> http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies:
> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|