| Subject: | [OM] Re: E-3 Ad |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:29:37 -0800 |
AG Schnozz wrote: > Well, that's one reason why I'm not standing in line for the first > batch. Even so, the E-1 was a winner right up front. Actually, > except for the 510's exposure woes Wasn't that early E-410s? And corrected. I don't recall reports of the 510 having the same problem. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Laptop vs Desktop, Jeff Keller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: RRS L-plate for Olympus E-3, Winsor Crosby |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-3 Ad, Richard Ociepka |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-3 Ad, Ali Shah |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |