Marc wrote:
> I've probably missed you showing it once before (I'm easily
> distracted by shiny things), but that first photo looks quite
> lovely.
Thank you. It's part of the following set:
http://image66media.com/Gallery/countrychurch01
All taken with the E-1 with 14-54. Raw conversion done in RawShooter
Essentials 2006. Absolutely no post-processing other than
resize--this was all during conversion.
> Even as a small web image, it *looks* like a very large print, or,
> at least, I can see it as one.
It's kinda strange. I've started going back the other way. After
producing a bunch of mega-images, I'm appreciating smallish B&W
prints. Prints which are too large tend to drive people away from
them, while smaller prints bring the viewer closer. One person, whom
I think has this really figured out is Chris Crawford. His images are
absolutely tops and I know that one of his 5x7 prints would easily
trump most of my mega-prints.
> Nice one. Very.
Thank you, I really appreciate the addaboy. Some of us thrive on
complements.
AG
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|