Nice shots no matter what lens took them.
Chuck Norcutt
iwert bernakiewicz wrote:
> Just to chime in:
>
> I have both 35shift and 24shift. Of the later series the 35 shift is
> almost on par with the 24 shift. Certainly considering colour
> rendition.
>
> The older 35 shift had less contrast and suffered more from reflections.
>
>>From about serial 110.000 on the coating on the 35 shift was changed
> to the (same?) type as the 24 shift, it at least shows the same
> colours in the coating, what the previous version didn't. The results
> from both lenses are now very much alike, however, at extreme shift
> the 24 is better in the corners than the 35 (but the 35 has more
> shift...)
>
> My 35 shift is a very sharp lens, which I like a lot for travel
> photography (much of my maroc pictures were made with this lens,
> perfect for avoiding crowds).
>
> http://zuiko.fotopic.net/c306376_13.html here frm 3-04 till 4-16 all
> images were with the 35 shift and kodak 400 vc and an epson flatbed
> scanner...
>
> I'ld really like to test these lenses once on a 5D or so.
>
> Just my experience,
>
> Iwert.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|