ML Archiv: [OM] Re: FZ50

Subject:	[OM] Re: FZ50
From:	Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 16:35:59 -0400

I did discount the JPEG.  That's why I pointed to the ACR image which 
had no noise reduction.

Chuck Norcutt

AG Schnozz wrote:
> 
> 4. If you are wanting to achieve the best possible image quality on
> the cheep/light, you'd be shooting RAW anyway.  Disregard everything
> you see about the in-camera JPEG engine.

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: FZ50, (continued) [OM] Re: FZ50, Ali Shah [OM] Re: FZ50, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: FZ50, Ali Shah [OM] Re: FZ50, Joel Wilcox [OM] Re: FZ50, AG Schnozz [OM] Re: FZ50, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: FZ50, AG Schnozz [OM] Re: FZ50, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: FZ50, Joel Wilcox [OM] Re: FZ50, AG Schnozz [OM] Re: FZ50, Chuck Norcutt <= [OM] Re: FZ50, Moose [OM] [E] OIS - Ouch, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Daniel Sepke [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Daniel Sepke [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Ali Shah [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Moose [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Timpe, Jim [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Andrew Fildes

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: FZ50, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Bridge explanation, Piers Hemy
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: FZ50, AG Schnozz
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: FZ50, Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]