| Subject: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth |
|---|---|
| From: | Richard Ociepka <ociepka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:15:42 -0400 |
Bill Pearce wrote: > > I stand by my advice to convert, to retain the maximum information. It's > always better to have more than less. > > Bill Pearce Using Photoshop I opened and saved a JPEG 25 times without any noticeable degradation. The file size also increases a little on every save. However, with ACDSee9 there was a noticeable loss after only 5 saves. http://www.pbase.com/ociepka/psc Dick ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Power source for T28 modelling lights, Frank van Lindert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Dan Mitchell |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Bill Pearce |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Winsor Crosby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |