ML Archiv: [OM] RAW Bit Depth

Subject:	[OM] RAW Bit Depth
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:31:22 -0700

I just recently discovered that the Leica M8 RAW file has a bit depth  
of only 8 bits unlike the 12 to 14 other makers have. Doesn't that  
just about kill the main advantage of RAW over a very high quality  
JPEG format, or TIFF?



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA





==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] RAW Bit Depth, Winsor Crosby <= [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Johnny Johnson [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Moose [OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Martyn Smoothy [OM] If you think all bits are created equal for image storage, you need to read this, even though it is long. [was RAW Bit Depth], Moose [OM] Re: If you think all bits are created equal for image storage, you need to read this, even though it is long. [was RAW Bit Depth], Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: If you think all bits are created equal for image storage, you need to read this, even though it is long. [was RAW Bit Depth], Moose [OM] Re: If you think all bits are created equal for image storage, you need to read this, even though it is long. [was RAW Bit Depth], Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: If you think all bits are created equal for image storage, you need to read this, even though it is long. [was RAW Bit Depth], Moose [OM] Re: If you think all bits are created equal for image storage, you need to read this, even though it is long. [was RAW Bit Depth], Winsor Crosby

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Low cost, high value compact?, Winsor Crosby
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Low cost, high value compact?, ScottGee1
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Oh s#@t, NSURIT
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: RAW Bit Depth, Bill Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]