Moose,
I have not read extensively on the subject but I have done an overlay of the
two sectional diagrams for the two lenses and they are as best as I can tell
the same. The difference may be in the manufacturing stages, particularly if
they are handled by two different firms or even lines within a factory
perhaps?
Dan S.
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Moose
Subject: [OM] Re: Digital Zuiko 18-180mm f3.5 - 6.3
Roger Key wrote:
> Does anyone have any practical experience of this lens?
Pop Photo likes it a lot
<http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/2695/lens-test-olympus-zuiko-digital-e
d-18-180mm-f35-63-af.html>.
> ....... I know that it is almost certainly a Sigma in disguise, but I have
tried it briefly at a photo show, and was impressed by the quality
feel......
>
I'm not so sure about the Sigma disguise. The Pop Photo review shows it to
have different dimensions and different performance.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|