Thanks, Tom.
I'm interested 85/2 more than 100/2.8 since 85/2 with floating
element close-distance correction mechanism. It helps me to get
better performance at close distance. As your opinion, F2 or F2.8 is
not a problem to me.
---
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
At 19 Jan 2007 7:51 PM ，Tom Fenwick wrote：
>
> Trying to be more helpful, if you want it for a light hiking lens the
> 100/2.8 is probably a good alternative... It's a good alternative
> anyway,
> just as small and light really, very similar performance, and the
> one stop
> smaller aperture wouldn't hold you back much out and about?
>
> Tom
>
> On 1/19/07, Tom Fenwick <super.wide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> What Wayne said! Sell an 85/2? That's crazy talk.
>>>
>>> Good luck though :-)
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|