Others have already suggested film or stitching. If you decide to try
stitching then parallax will be a problem in close quarters so here is a
lesson in finding the nodal point to eliminate the parallax error.
<http://www.panoguide.com/howto/panoramas/setup_panohead.jsp> But you
will need a level and some sort of slide mechanism such as the focusing
rail if you have one.
One thing that no one mentioned regarding rental of equipment is to go
rent another body and maybe a lens. If you have a wide OM mount lens
you could rent a full frame Canyon body and use an adapter or just rent
body and lens together. You'll also get a chance to try the
comptetitive gear if you're seriously thinking about moving on to C or N.
Chuck Norcutt
Daniel Sepke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I have a question about a job that I am doing that is probably going to
> require me to have a slightly wider angle lens than the DZ 11-22mm that I
> already own. It is shooting some higher end kitchen and cabinetry installs
> for a local custom builder. Most of the shots I am planning for are in
> spaces that the 11mm is wide enough for but there are a couple of places
> where it would be useful to have a slightly wider lens. None of the spaces
> are as tight as say some of the compact bathrooms that Jeff Keller has shown
> us in California (though the price tags are close to the ones in CA here in
> NC you get a whole lot more square footage for $800K). My dilemma comes from
> the two options below:
>
> 1. Buy the DZ 7-14mm for my E-1.
>
> 2. Buy a Sigma 12-24mm in N*kon mount and either a D80 or F*ji S3.
>
> Both of these options come in at about the same sort of money ($1700) but
> that is not the problem for me. And yes I will acknowledge that they are not
> the same coverage the DZ gives 14mm equiv vs.. 18mm from the Sigma. In the
> situation I am looking at the max FL of the Sigma should be wide enough.
> Most of my concern comes from the future of the professional end of the E
> System. Like AG I find myself wondering how long I can sustain the E-1 and
> the E System as a professional tool. While I do have a rather different
> style of photography business than Ken does I find myself sharing a lot of
> his perspectives on where the E System is going and the long term view of
> my/our respective needs. Specifically of concern is the specter of the E-3
> that haunts us all. Its eventual appearance and impact in the market will
> determine if I stay with the E System. This is something I really want to do
> but without a significant leap technologically I fear that the professional
> end of the E System will be wound down. Unlike Ken what I have not done is
> set a date by which something must have happened at Olympus before I make a
> switch.
>
> So offer me your perspectives, comments for and against; all are welcome.
>
> Dan S.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|