Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Super Tak 50mm F1.4 vs Zuiko 50mm F1.4

Subject: [OM] Re: Super Tak 50mm F1.4 vs Zuiko 50mm F1.4
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:03:20 -0400
Thanks.  I thought that was a bit early.  I went to the Pentax website 
to look up the history and see that I was confusing the K model camera 
with the K mount.  The K mount didn't come about until 1975.

Chuck Norcutt

Bill Pearce wrote:

> 
>>Since the Pentax K bayonet mount was announced in 1958 your screw mount
>>Takumar could be pretty old.  I would hope that 20 years of lens and
>>coating developments were worth something.
> 
> Can't be possible. It was early 1970 when I traded my Spotmatic on a Nikon 
> F, as I was fed up with the screw mount/stop down business.
> 
> I'd believe 1978.
> 
> I'll bet the Super Takumar is better. I believe the Super means better 
> coatings. The 50/1.4 was frequently the lens that got a lot of attention 
> from the designers, but that idea somehow passed the Olympus lens designers 
> by. Frankly, I'm glad that they spent their money elsewhere.
> 
> Bill Pearce 



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz